
According to the research, most complaints about racial bias
concerned sentences perceived to be more severe than those
imposed on a similar white defendant
 |
|
"Perceptions of racial bias... may well
arise from a belief that the disproportionately large number
of black people caught up by the criminal justice and prison
systems must, at least to some extent, be a reflection of
racism"
 |
|
|
According to a study by the Lord Chancellorís Department amongst
black defendants and lawyers in particular there was a belief that
the authority and legitimacy of the courts, and confidence in them,
would be strengthened if more personnel from ethnic minorities were
seen to be playing a part in the administration of criminal justice.
The study was carried out by the University of Oxford Centre for
Criminological Research in association with the University of
Birmingham School of Law.
The research investigated the extent to which ethnic minority
defendants and witnesses in Crown and magistrates' courts perceived
their treatment to have been unfair, whether any unfairness was
attributed to racial bias, and how this affected their confidence in
the criminal courts.
Their experiences were compared with those of white defendants. The
study also took into account the views of court staff, judges,
magistrates and lawyers.
The research provides that when ethnic minority defendants were
asked whether they thought their unfair treatment in court had
anything to do with their ethnicity, a lower proportion said
definitely, twenty per cent (20%) of black defendants in the Crown
Court said yes they had been unfairly treated because of their
ethnicity, and ten per cent (10%) in the magistrates' courts. About
12.5% of Asian defendants in both types of court thought they had
been unfairly treated because of their ethnicity.
According to the research, most complaints about racial bias
concerned sentences perceived to be more severe than those imposed
on a similar white defendant. Very few perceived racial bias in the
conduct or attitude of judges or magistrates. Only three per cent
(3%) in the Crown Court and one per cent (1%) in the magistrates'
courts.
There were no complaints about racist remarks from the bench
provides the research.
Sixteen per cent (16%) of witnesses in the Crown Court complained of
unfair treatment, almost the same proportion amongst black, white
and Asian witnesses. But none of the 68 ethnic minority witnesses
complained of racial bias states the research.
The research recognised that there were still real perceptions of
racial bias which has to be addressed. This fact provides the
researchers is sufficient cause to continue the efforts towards
eliminating the vestiges of perceived unequal treatment.
Report states, "Perceptions of racial bias, more frequently held
by black defendants in the Crown Court, may well arise from a belief
that the disproportionately large number of black people caught up
by the criminal justice and prison systems must, at least to some
extent, be a reflection of racism. Every effort therefore should be
made when passing sentence to demonstrate and convince defendants
that no element of racial stereotyping or bias has entered into the
decision"
The report concludes that it had identified a cultural change which
meant differential sentencing of white and ethnic minority
defendants was being eliminated. However states the report if this
not shown, views that there is differential sentencing based on race
will continue to be held.
The study took into account the views of court staff, judges,
magistrates and lawyers. 1,252 people were interviewed in
Manchester, Birmingham, and London and the proceedings in more than
500 cases were observed.
|
|
|